LingoHub · Scene worksheet
场景 06 · 20 分钟造雨人 · John Grisham's The Rainmaker
The client-owned settlement 场景学习单
本场重点:律师建议和解但客户要承担时间、费用、保密与长期影响时,用目标排序、净结果、情景区间、独立时间和书面理解,让建议不代替客户决定
01
理解
先读场景与人物目标,不逐词翻译。
02
遮挡复述
遮住中文,用英文复述关键意思。
03
迁移表达
把高价值表达改写到自己的情境。
语言观察
“A recommendation is not a decision until the client can compare its consequences.” 用 until 把有效建议连接到客户可比较的后果。
Read and notice
原创双语场景
INT. LEGAL AID CONFERENCE ROOM — MORNING
内景 · 法律援助会议室 · 早晨
A lawyer places a settlement deadline beside a client’s handwritten goals and a fee statement with several blank estimates.
律师把和解截止时间放在客户手写目标和一份留有多处空白估算的费用表旁。
LAWYER
I recommend accepting. It is the safest result, and another day of delay could lose the offer.
我建议接受。这是最安全的结果,再拖一天可能就会失去要约。
CLIENT ADVISER
A recommendation is not a decision until the client can compare its consequences.
在客户能够比较后果之前,建议还不是决定。
CLIENT
Rank my goals: immediate funds, future care, public accountability, privacy, time, relationship repair, and ability to move on.
请排序我的目标:即时资金、未来照护、公共责任、隐私、时间、关系修复和继续生活的能力。
LAWYER
Show the gross amount, fees, costs, liens, timing, conditions, uncertainty, and estimated net range—not one headline number.
展示总金额、费用、成本、留置、时间、条件、不确定性和预计净额区间,而不是一个标题数字。
CLIENT ADVISER
Compare accept, counter, continue, and pause by best supported, middle, and worst credible outcomes with their evidence.
将接受、还价、继续和暂停分别按最有支持、中间与可信最坏结果及其依据进行比较。
LAWYER
Read confidentiality, release scope, future claims, payment triggers, enforcement, and breach consequences in plain language.
用通俗语言解释保密、放弃权利范围、未来请求、付款触发、执行和违约后果。
CLIENT
I receive the final writing, may consult someone independent, ask questions without pressure, and confirm my choice in my own words.
我会收到最终文本,可以咨询独立人士、无压力提问,并用自己的话确认选择。
The group returns to the opening concern—“I recommend accepting. It is the safest result, and another day of delay could lose the offer.”—and compares it with the later response before closing the scene.
众人重新审视开场问题——“我建议接受。这是最安全的结果,再拖一天可能就会失去要约。”——并在结束场景前把它与后续回应进行比较。
LAWYER
Which part is a request, which part is permission, and what may be refused or withdrawn without losing an existing right?
哪一部分是请求,哪一部分是许可,又有哪些内容可以拒绝或撤回而不失去现有权利?
CLIENT ADVISER
Permission will name its scope, audience, duration, storage, withdrawal route, and the consequence of saying no.
许可会写明范围、受众、期限、保存方式、撤回渠道,以及拒绝会产生什么后果。
Two phrases remain visible on the shared note: “compare its consequences” and “estimated net range,” each linked to the exact line that gives it force in the discussion.
共用记录上保留两个表达:“compare its consequences”(比较其后果)与“estimated net range”(预计净额区间),并分别连接到赋予其讨论力量的原句。
CLIENT
An independent person will check that silence was not treated as agreement and that no benefit depends on continued permission.
由独立人员检查沉默是否被误当成同意,以及任何福利是否以持续许可为条件。
The longer passage separates relationship, request, permission, refusal, and repair instead of compressing them into one yes.
加长段落把关系、请求、许可、拒绝和补救分别展开,不再压缩成一个笼统的“同意”。
A second pass through “The client-owned settlement” slows the exchange where “I recommend accepting. It is the safest result, and another day of delay could lose the offer.” still leaves motive, consequence, or responsibility unstated.
第二轮细读“The client-owned settlement”时,交流在“我建议接受。这是最安全的结果,再拖一天可能就会失去要约。”仍未说明动机、后果或责任的位置慢下来。
CLIENT ADVISER
What information would change the decision, who benefits from agreement, and can refusal remain safe, private, and free of retaliation?
什么信息会改变决定,谁会从同意中受益,而拒绝是否仍能保持安全、私密且不受报复?
LAWYER
The explanation will cover purpose, alternatives, foreseeable effects, data use, expiration, withdrawal, and the contact responsible for correction.
说明会覆盖目的、替代方案、可预见影响、数据用途、到期时间、撤回方式和负责纠正的联系人。
The speakers test how “compare its consequences” changes the force of “worst credible outcomes,” then restate the distinction without relying on either phrase.
说话者检验“compare its consequences”(比较其后果)如何改变“worst credible outcomes”(可信的最坏结果)的语气力度,然后不依赖这两个短语重新说明区别。
CLIENT
A signature can document a decision, but it cannot repair missing information, hidden pressure, or an unusable withdrawal route.
签名可以记录决定,却无法弥补信息缺失、隐性压力或无法使用的撤回渠道。
CLIENT ADVISER
We will pause the request, provide the missing details in plain language, and ask again only after independent questions are possible.
我们会暂停请求,用清楚的语言补齐细节,并只在对方能够独立提问后再次询问。
They rehearse one careful version, one direct version, and one version for a listener who enters late, checking that “estimated net range” still leads to the same next step.
他们分别排练谨慎版、直接版和面向迟到听众的版本,检查“estimated net range”(预计净额区间)是否仍然导向同一个下一步。
Before the scene closes, “compare its consequences” and “worst credible outcomes” are placed beside the unresolved pressure in “The client-owned settlement,” giving the speakers one more round to challenge, concede, reframe, and hand off the decision.
场景结束前,“compare its consequences”(比较其后果)与“worst credible outcomes”(可信的最坏结果)被放回“The client-owned settlement”尚未解决的压力旁,让说话者再完成一轮质疑、让步、重述与交接。
LAWYER
If saying no changes access, status, safety, or the relationship, how can we claim the answer is voluntary, and what must change before asking again?
如果拒绝会改变机会、身份、安全或关系,我们凭什么说回答是自愿的,又必须先改变什么才能再次询问?
CLIENT ADVISER
I accept that an earlier yes may document one moment, but it does not cover a new audience, a longer duration, hidden pressure, or a changed purpose.
我承认先前的同意只能记录一个时刻,不能覆盖新的受众、更长期限、隐性压力或已经改变的目的。
CLIENT
Then permission will be specific, informed, reversible, and separate from unrelated benefits, with silence treated as a reason to pause rather than agreement.
那么许可必须具体、知情、可撤回,并与无关利益分开;沉默应被视为暂停理由,而不是同意。
LAWYER
I will pass on the approved scope, excluded uses, expiration, withdrawal route, and correction contact so no later participant has to guess what was allowed.
我会交接获准范围、排除用途、到期时间、撤回渠道和纠正联系人,让后来的参与者无需猜测哪些内容曾被允许。
The longer dialogue now leaves “The client-owned settlement” with an acknowledged objection, a revised frame, a named owner, and a handoff that can be checked after the conversation ends.
更长的对话让“The client-owned settlement”在结束时留下已被承认的异议、经过修订的框架、具名负责人,以及能在谈话结束后继续核验的交接。
The fuller scene treats consent as an informed, reversible process rather than a single line of approval.
更完整的场景把同意视为知情且可撤回的过程,而不是一句单独的批准。
The lawyer’s recommendation becomes a client-owned comparison with ranked goals, net ranges, four scenarios, plain terms, and teach-back.
律师建议变成由客户掌握的比较表,包含目标排序、净额区间、四种情景、通俗条款和复述确认。
Useful language
高价值表达
compare its consequences
/kəmˈper ɪts ˈkɑːnsəkwensɪz/
比较其后果
客户需要看到不同路径怎样影响自己的多项目标。
我的例句
estimated net range
/ˈestəmeɪtɪd net reɪndʒ/
预计净额区间
以扣除和不确定性后的范围代替醒目总额。
我的例句
worst credible outcomes
/wɜːrst ˈkredəbəl ˈaʊtkʌmz/
可信的最坏结果
用合理证据支持的风险场景,不用恐吓性极端例子。
我的例句
confirm my choice in my own words
/kənˈfɜːrm maɪ tʃɔɪs ɪn maɪ oʊn wɜːrdz/
用自己的话确认选择
复述决定、条件与主要取舍,检验真实理解。
我的例句
输出练习
1. 用 2 句英文概括场景中的沟通问题。
2. 选一个高价值表达,改写成你本周可能真正使用的句子。
3. 如果你是场景中的另一方,你会怎样回应?
我能说清场景目标
我能复述关键台词
我写了自己的例句